The Qualities of Sensing and Intuition

- By a friend of the CT admins -

Do you put more stock in facts than in flighty theory and philosophy? Do you prefer to do something every day? Are you results-oriented? Then you are probably Sensing.

Or would you rather ignore immediate events in favor of discussing ideas and abstract concepts? Do you find the sports channel boring? Do you have a hard time remembering the color of the building outside your window or where you put those important tax documents? Then you might be iNtuitive.

Sensing and iNtuition

Sensing and iNtuition describe two different ways to process information from the outside world:

A Sensing type (S) focuses his attention on the impressions provided by the five senses. Sensers focus on their concrete experiences. Roughly speaking, the memory of a Sensing type serves as a photo album containing snapshots from various events. Sensers relate directly to their surroundings and make decisions quickly and instinctively, and when a Sensing type plans for the future, these plans involve specific events and activities.

In contrast we have the iNtuitive type (N) who tends to tune out the immediate sensory impressions and use his reflective capacities to identify the underlying patterns of these sensory impressions instead. INtuitives tend to remember less about individual episodes and more about what he perceived to be the causes and consequences of a given chain of events. INtuitives cherish having time for analysis and thinking and their reactions are typically not immediate, the way those of Sensers are, but instead manifest themselves after a period of reflection.

As a concrete example of the difference between S and N, let us imagine that an S and an N go to the movies to see Top Gun. Afterward they are each asked to sum it up. The S type will say that Top Gun is about a bunch of elite pilots undergoing military training and eventually they end up fighting the Russians. But the N type will say that Top Gun is a homo-erotic love drama.

The concepts of Sensing and iNtuition come from the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). MBTI theory assumes that humans have a natural preference for either S or N, and that this preference can be clearly identified for each person. MBTI is used on a very large scale within the coaching and HR industries and substantial financial interests are at stake to support this assumption of binarity. But the scientific basis for humans to have this unique and unequivocal preference is extremely fragile, and so while a person’s height or weight can be measured objectively, there is no such objective standard when it comes to MBTI. So in principle, your opinion about whether I am S or N is just a good as mine.

What does make good sense, however, is to apply the concepts in the description of behavioral patterns: When my friend tells me that he was at a very iNtuitive birthday party, I will know right away that what he means is that this party featured lively and abstract discussion on high-brow subjects. I would also know that there was probably no loud music or dance floor – which is what I would expect if my friend had instead told me that the birthday party in question was extremely Sensing.

Strengths and Weaknesses

So basically, where the Sensers are the masters of action, the iNtuitives tend to be at home in the domain of abstract thinking. This divide has led to a kind of thinly veiled elitism amongst the iNtuitives who perceive themselves as more profound than the Sensing types as well as completely unfettered and without any real constraints to their ideas. When iNtuitives are out there selling instruments like the MBTI to a Sensing audience, the iNtuitives tell the Sensers that they are much more in touch with their five senses, but when the iNtuitives converse in a all-iNtuitive setting, they perceive Sensers as limited beings, wholly unable to reason in the abstract domain.

IF the iNtuives could actually manage to implement ideas from their abstract thoughts into their daily lives, then their elitism might actually be justified. But this is where the weakness of iNtuitives becomes apparent.

Because he gets caught up in his abstract ideas and internal world of reflection, the iNtuitive forgets about what is real. Theoretical analysis is engaged in not because it is necessary, but because it is entertaining. Introspective psychological insights of an uncomfortable nature (those that are the prerequisite for real growth and maturation) may come quicker to iNtuitive types than they do to the Sensing types, but being endowed with their over-active capacity for reflection, iNtuitives will quickly and painlessly spin out new alternative theories on the matter that effectively drown out the inconvenient truth.

Another thing about iNtuition: INtuitive types are abstract in their reasoning, but a capacity for abstract thinking is by no means the same as a capacity for logical thinking. Despite the fact that it is impossible to determine with 100% certainty whether a given person is S or N, you will nevertheless find dozens of threads at http://www.typologycentral.com that eagerly discuss whether a given celebrity is S or N. Typology Central is of course, an N-dominated website, because which Senser would bother to waste his time like this?

So while a person would be justified in pointing out that Sensers are slow(er) to recognize patterns and read between the lines, it would be equally fair to emphasize that iNtuitives can sometimes have a very hard time finding a concrete application and outlet for their abstract ideas.

What is best?

In my opinion you should strive to master the positive elements of both Sensing and iNtuition. To apply iNtuition makes sense, provided that there is a real problem to be solved. To practice abstract thinking just for the sport is fine, but only if it is not at the expense of productive action. Conversely, to live wholly in the senses is natural, as long as you remember to reflect upon yourself and your surroundings every now and again and implement any changes that may be necessary.

Finally, if you are a Senser, and you are made to feel inferior by the iNtuitives around you, please take that in stride. A person who forgets to apply iNtuition may have to repeat some mistakes in in his life, but while doing so, he is actually out there, living life. An iNtuitive who neglects Sensing will not even realize that he is forgoing concrete action until one day he wakes up to the uncomfortable realization that he has spent years doing… nothing!

7 comments on “The Qualities of Sensing and Intuition

  1. Hi,

    ISTJ here. I’d like to say that your sight is both fun and informative!

    One thing I have always struggled with is poor intution. Though I have read a lot about Ni and Ne on the internet, I don’t really know how to practice it and develop it. While they tell iNtuitives wanting to develop their Sensing functions to just take things in in a literal sense, ie how something literally tastes like or feels like or looks like (big, small, color) etc, I have not seen any instruction or tips on how to be more iNtuitive. Would you have any suggestions? Thanks…

  2. Whoops, by “sight” I meant “site”…

  3. Mark Novbett on said:

    Hi there Norm,

    Intuition is something that ppl like me (NT category) had without knowing since childhood. It has always been this way for me. Specific childhood events and my upbringing might have had a part to play towards turning me into a initial INTP which I worked on to bring out my ENTP/INTJ sides more often. Once I started realizing that I’ve been burying my Sensing Side and it’s actually bad for me, I started practicing/ developing my Sensing side simply by trying to be more extrovert. Ironically. The sensing side and being an extrovert had connections to develop. Thus, I was also able to show my ENFP characteristics.

    If you’d like to be more intuitive, I’d advise trying to find patterns behind each and every little and big thing in daily life, in politics, in everything pretty much. Developing a intuitive side is very hard, guessing way harder than it was for me to bring out my ENTP side.

    I’m still an INTP with occasional INTJ or ENTP results. It’s hard and will take a long time. Good Luck.

  4. Mark Novbett on said:

    One more thing. My personality growth had a lot to do with who I spent my time with, whether it was only by myself or with friends. My best friend’s an ENTP with a strong I/J side thus making him an occasional INTJ/ENTJ. He has had a lot to do with how I’ve grown up to be. Then again, I am an introvert, so, what worked for me may not work for an extrovert by default.

  5. Monarc on said:

    I like the advice you gave, Mark. I also found that being more extraverted improved my memory.

    I’ll add to developing intuition “engaging in a free-flow of thought”. Just let the thoughts stream through your mind and connect them freely. Write those that you can remember. Or else, you can get a collection of words and arrange them in alternative ways. After this exercise, you try to figure out what the mambo-jambo you’ve written means. You can also get a topic and try to argue for and against by your own ideas. After, you analyze for correctness by either looking for logic or observing life or gathering information to confirm. This is very ENTP but it works.

    I also have had Intuition for long but unaware of it. My behavior and philosophy is very Socrates and I fell in love with he, Einstein and Russell immediately I met them – met Socrates first. One other person who’s most likely ENTP is King Leonidas – that witty but biting criticism of anothers logic and his irreverent humor gives it away and he actually sees it as a service. With life circumstances, Feeling has developed to dampen the harsher attributes of being an ENTP – I am classic ENTP only when it matters.

    What do you think about Giordano Bruno’s type? I’ll say he’s also ENTP

  6. Norm: Smoke weed. Or take other hallucinogens.

    You’re welcome.

    Signed,
    INTP

  7. Just like Monarc said, I would also be very interested with what you folks believe Giordano Bruno’s type to be. He was a metaphysician, philosopher, and cosmologist who constructed a revolutionary map of our universe, one that is infinite in its creations and dynamic in its design. I would type him as an INTJ, but I could also see any of the 4 NT types for him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

44,826 Spam Comments Blocked so far by Spam Free Wordpress

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>